Divisions with shi’ism

Each religion possesses a certain number of primary principles which from its essential basis and other principles of secondary importance. when the followers of religion differ as to the nature of the primary principles and their secondary aspects but preserve a common basis, the result is called division (inshi’ab) within that religion.

the start of divisions within shi’ism
Such divisions exist in all traditions and religions, and more particularly in the four revealed religions of Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastianiam, and Islam.
Shi’ism did not undergo any divisions during the imamate of the first three Imam. Ali, Has an, and Hussein. But after the martyrdom of Hussein, the majority of the shi’ites the accepted the imamate of Ali ibn Hossein al- sajjad, while a minority known as the kisaniyah believed that the third son of Ali, Muhammad ibn Hanafiyah, was fourth Imam as well as the promised Mahdi, and that he had gone into occultation in the Radwa mountains and one day would reappear. After the death of Imamal- sajjad the majority of the Shiites accepted as Imam his son, Muhammad al-Baqir, while a minority followed zayed al- shahid, another son of Imam- Sajjad, and became known as zaydis. Following Imam Muhammad al- Baqir, the shi’ites accepted his son ja’far al-sadiq as Imam and after the death of Imam Musa al- kazim as the seventh Imam However, one group followed the older son of the sixth Imam, Isma’il who had died while his father was still alive, and when this latter group separated from the majority of shi’ites it became known as Isma’ilis. Others accepted as Imam either Abdollah al-After or Muhammad, both sons of the sixth Imam Finally, another party stopped with the sixth Imam himself and considered him as last Imam. In the same way, after the martyrdom of Imam Musa al-Kazim the majority followed his son, Ali al- Rida, as the eight Imams. However, some stopped with the seventh Imam and became known as the waqifiyah, from the eighth Imam to the twelfth, whom the majority of the shi’ites believes to the promised Mahdi, no division of any importance took place within shi’ism. Even if certain events occurred in the from of division, they hasted but a few days and dissolved by themselves. For example, Ja’far the son of the tenth Imam. A group of people followed him but scattered in a few days and Ja’far himself did not follow his claim any further. Further more, there are differences between shi’ites in theological and juridical matters which mush not be considered as division in religious schools. Also the Babi and Bahai’ sects, which like the Batinis (the Qaramitah), differ in both the principles (usual) and branches (furu) of Islam from the Muslims, should in any sense be considered as branches of shi’ism.

extination of some of the devided sects
The sects which separated from the majority of shi’ites all dissolved within a short period, except two: the zaydi and the Ismai’li which continue to exist until now. To this day communities of these branches are active in various parts of the world such as the Yemen, India, and Syria. There fore, we shall limit our discussion to these branches along with the majority of shi’ites who are Twelvers.

The basic and remained sects

Zaylism
The zayids are the followers of zayd al- shahid, the son of Imam al- sajjad. Zayd rebelled in 121/737 against the Umayyad caliph His ham Abd al- Malik and group paid allegiance to him. A battle ensued in kufa between zayd and the army of the caliph in which zayd was killed. The followers of zayd regard him as the fifth Imam of the Household of the prophet. After him his son, Yahya ibn zayd, who rebelled against the caliph walid ibn Yazid and was also killed, took his place After Yahya, Muhammad ibn Abdallah and Ibrahim ibn Abdallah, who revolted against the Abbasid caliph Mansur al- Dawaniqi and were also killed, were chosen as Imams.

Henceforth some time there was disorder in zaydi ranks until Nasir al- Utrush, a descendant of the brother of zayd, arose in khurasan.Being pursued by the governmental authorities in that region, he fled to Mazandaran, becoming himself Imam. For some time his descendants continued to rule as Imam in that area.

According to zaydi belief any descendant of Fatimah (thedaughter of the propher) who begins an uprising in the name of defending the truth may become Imam if he is learned in the religious sciences, ethically pure, courageous and generous. Yet for some time after Utrush and his descendants there was no Imam who could bring about an insurrection with the sword until recently when, about sixly years ago, Imam Yahya revolted in the Yemen ,which had been part of the Ottoman Empire, made it independent, and began to rule there as Imam. His desendants continued to rule in that region as Imam until very recently.

At the beginning the zaydis, like zayd him self, considered the first two caliphs, Abu Bakr and Umar as their Imams. But after a while some of them began to delete the name of the first two caliphs from the list of Imams and placed Ali as the first Imam.

From what is known of zaydi beliefs it can be said that in the principles of IsIam (usual) they follow apath close to that of Mu’tazilites, while in the branches or derivative institutions of the law (furu) they apply the jurisprudence of Abu Hanifah, the founder of one of the four Sunni schools of law. They also differ among themselves concerning certain problems.

Isma’ilism and its branches
Batinis
Imam Ja’far al-sadiq had ason named Isma’il who was the oldest of his children. Isma; died during the lifetime of his father who summoned witnesses to his death, including the governor of Medina. Concerning this question. Some believed that Isma’il did not die but went into occultation that he would appear again and would be the promised Mahdi. They further believed that the summoning of witnesses on the part of the Imam for Isma’il death was a way of hiding the truth in fear of al- Mansur, the Abbasid caliph. Another group believed that the true Imam was Isma’il whose death meant the imamate was transferred to his son Muhammad. A third group also helps that although he died during the lifetimes of his father he was the Imam and that the imamate passed after him to Muhammad ibn Isma’il and his descendants. The first two groups soon became extinct, while the third branch continues to exist to this day and has undergone a certain amount of division.

The principles of "beliefs" and "thought" of Isma’ilism
The Isma’ilis have a philosophy in many ways similar to that of the sabaeans (star worshippers) combined with elements of Hindu gnosis. In the sciences and decrees of Islam they they believe that exterior reality (zahir) has an inner aspect (batin) and each element of revelation (tanzil) ahermeneutic and esoteric exegesis (ta’wil).

The Isma’ilis believes that earth can never exist without proof (hujjah) of God. Theproof is two kind’s speaker (natiq) and silent one (samit).The speaker is a prophet and the silent one is an Imam or Guardian (wali) who is the inheritor, or executor of the testament (wasi) of a prophet. In any case the proof of God is the perfect theophany of the Divinity. The principle of the proof of God revolves constantly around the number seven. A prophet (nabi) who is sent by God has the function of prophecy(nubuwwat), of bringing a Divine Law or shari’ah. A prophet, who is the perfect manifestation of God, has the esoteric power of initiating men into the Divine Mysteries ( walayat). After him there are seven executors of his testament (wasayat) and the power of esoteric initiation into the Divine Mysteries (wasayat) the seventh in the succession possesses those two powers and also the additional power of prophecy (nubuwwat) the cycle of seven executors (wasi) Is then repeated with the seventh a prophet.

The Ismai’li says that Adam was sent as prophet with the power of prophecy and of esoteric guidance and he had seven executors of whom the seventh was Noah, who had the three functions of nubuwwat, wasayat, and walayat. Abraham was the seventh executor (wasi) of Noah, Moses the seventh executor of Abraham, Jesus the seventh executor of Moses Muhammad the seventh executor of Jesus, and Muhammad ibn Ismai’l the seventh executor of Muhammad.

They consider the wasis of the prophet to be, Ali Hossein ibn Ali (they do not consider Imam Hasan among the Imam), Ali ibn Hossein al- sajjad Muhammad al-Baqir, Ja’far al-sadiq Ismai’l ibn Ja’far. and Muhammad ibn Ismai’I After this series three are seven descendants of Muhammad ibn Ismai’l whose names are hidden and secret. After them there are the first seven rulers of the Fatimid caliphate of Egypt the first of whom, Ubaydallah al- Mahdi, was the founder of the Fatimid dynasty. The Ismai’lis also believe that in addition to the proof of God there are always present on earth twelve chiefs (naqib) who are the companions and elite followers of the proof some of the branches of the Batinis, however, like theDruzes, believe six of the chiefs to be from the Imam and six from others.

the appearancr of Qaramites and subsequent events
In the year 278/ 891, a few years before the appearance of Ubayallah al- Mahdi in North Africa there appeared in kufa an unknown person from khuzistan (in southern Persia) who never revealed his name and identity. He would fast during the day and worship at night and made a living from his own labor. In addition he invited people to join the Isma’il cause and was able to assemble a large number of people about him From among them he chose twelve chiefs (naqib) and he set out for Damascus Having left kufe he was never heard of again.

This unknown man was replaced by Ahmad, known as the Qaramite, who began to propagate Batini teaching in Iraq. As the historians have recorded, he instituted two daily prayers in place of the five of Islam, removed the ablution after sexual intercourse, and made the drinking of wine permissible. Contemporary with these events, other Batini leaders rose to invite people to join their cause and assembled group of followers.

The Batinis had no respect for the lives and possessions of those who outside their group. For this reason they began uprisings in the cities of Iraq. Bahrain, the Yemen, and Syria, spilling the blood of people and looting their wealth. Many times they stopped the caravans of those who were making the pilgrimage to Mecca, killing tens of thousands of pilgrims and plundering their provisions and camels. Abu Tahir al- Qaramati, one of the Qaramite leaders who in 311/ 923 had conquered Basra and did not neglect to kill and plunder, set out with a large number of Batinis for Mecca in 317/929. After overcoming the brief resistance of government troops he entered the city and massacred the population as well as the newly arrived pilgrims. Even within the Masjid al- haram (the mosque containing the ka’bah ) and within the Holy Ka’bah itself, there flowed streams of blood. He divided the covering of the Ka’bah between his disciples. He tore away the door of the Ka’bah and took the black stone from its place black to the Yemen. For twenty – two years the black stone was in Qaramite hada. As a result of these actions the majority of Muslims turned completely away from the Batinis and considered them outside the pale of Islam. Even Ubydallh al-Mahdi, the Fatimid rule, who had risen in those days in North Africa and considered himself the promisedMahdi, abhorred them.

According to the view of historians the distinguishing characteristic of the Batini School is that it interprets the external aspects of Islam in an esoteric manner and considers the external of the shari’ ah to be only for simple – minded people of little intelligence who are deprived of spiritual perfection. Yet occasionally the Batini Imams did order certain regulations and laws to be practiced and followed.

Other branches of Ismai’lism
The Nizais. Ubydllah al- Mahdi, who rose in North Africa in 292/ 904 and as an Ismai’l declared his imamate and established Fatimid rule, is the founder of the dynasty whose desendants made Cairo the center of their caliphate. For seven generations this sultanate and Ismai’li imamate continued without Imam al- Mustansir bi’llah Mu’idd ibn Ali, his sons, Nizar and al- Musta’li began to dispute over the caliphate and imamate. After long disputes and bloody battle al- Musta’li was victorious. He captured his brother Nizar and placed him in prison, where he died.

Following this dispute those who accepted the Fatimids divided into two groups the Nizaris and the Musta’lis. The Nizaris are followers of Hasan al- sabbah, who was one of the close associates of al- Mustansir. After Nizer’s death, because of his support of Nizar, Hasan al- Sabbah was expelled from Egypt by al- Musta’li. He came to Persia and after a short while appeared in the fort of Alamut near Qazwin. He conquered Alamut and several surrounding forts. There he established his rule and also began to invite people to the Isma’ili cause.

After the death of Hasan in 518/1124 Buzurg Umid Rudbari and after him his son, kiya Muhammad continued to rule following the methods and ways of has an al- Sabbath. After kiya Muhammad, his son Hasan AlaDhikrihi’l- Salam, the fouth ruler of Alamut, changed the ways of has an al- Sabbath, who had been Niazri, and became Batini, Henceforth the Isama’ili forts continued as Batini. For other rulers Muhammad ibn Abu Dhikrui’l-Salam, Jala al Din has an, Ala’ al Din, and Rukn al Din khurshah, became sultan and Imam one after another until Hulagu, the Mongol conqueror, invaded Persia. He captured Isma’ili forts and put all the Isma’ilis to death, leveling their forts to the ground.

Centuries later in 1255/1839 the Aqa khan of Mahalat in Persia, who belonged to the Nizaris, rebelled aginst Muhammad shah Qqjar in kerman, but he was defeated and fled to Bombay. There he prtpagted his Batini- Nizari cause which continues to this day. TheNizaris are today called the Aqa khanida.

The Musta’lis. The Musta’lis was the followersof al- Musta’li. Their imamate continued during Fathmid rule in Egypt until was brought to an end in the year567/1171. Shorty thereafter, the Bohra sect, following the same school, appeared in India and survives to this day.

The Druzes .the Druzes, who live in the Druze Mountains in Syria (and also in Lebanon), were originally followers of the Fatimid caliphs. But as a result of the missionary activity of Nashtakin, the Druzes joined the Batini set. The Druzes stop with the sixth Fatimid caliph al- Hakim bi’llah, whom others believer to have been killed, and claim that claim that he is in occultation. He has ascended to heaven and will appear once again to the world.

The Muqanna’ah. The Muqanna’ah were at first disciples of Ata al – Marwi known as Muqanna’ who according to historical sources was a follower of Abu Muslim of khurasan. After the death of Abu Muslim, Muqanna’ claimed that Abu Muslim’s Muqann’a claimed that Abu Muslim’s soul had became incarnted in him soon he claimed to be a prophet and later a divinity. Finally, in the year 126/777 he was surrounded in the fort of kabash in Transoxiana. When he became certain that he would be captured and killed, he threw himself into a fire along with some of his disciples and burned to death. His followers soon adopted Isma’ilism and the ways of the Batinis.

Twelve –Imam Shi’ism
The majority of the shi’ites, from whom the previously mentioned groups have branched out, is Twelve- Imam Shi’iles, also called the Imamates. Are has already been mentioned, the shi’ite came into being because of criticism and protest concerning two basic problems of IsIam, without having any objections to the religious ways which through the instructions of the prophet had become prevalent among their contemporary Muslims. These two problems concerned Islamic government and authority in the religious sciences, both of which the shi’ites considered to be the particular right of the House hold of the prophet.

The shi’ites asserted that the Islamic caliphate, of which esoteric guidance and spiritual leadership are inseparable elements, belongs to Ali and his descendants. They also believed that according to the specification of the prophet the Imams of the House hold of the prophet are twelve in number. Shi’ism held, moreover, that that external teaching of the Quran, which are the injunctions and regulations of the shari’ah and include the principles of a complete spiritual life, are valid and applicable for every one at all times, and are not to be abrogated until the Day of Judgment. These injunctions and regulations must be learned through the guidance of the House hold of the prophet.

The difference between twelve – Imam Shi’ism and zaydism and Ismailism
From a consideration of these points it becomes clear that the difference between Twelve – Imam Shi’ism and zaydism is that zaydis usually do not consider the imamate to belong solely to the House hold of the prophet and do not Iimit the number of Imams to twelve. Also they do not follow the jurisprudence of the House hold of the prophet as the Twelve- Imam shi’ites.

The difference between the twelve – Imam Shi’ism and Isma’ilism lies in that for the latter the imamate revolves around the number seven and prophecy does not terminate with the holy prophet Muhammad Also for them, change and transformation in the injunctions of the shari’ah are admissible, as is even rejection of the duty of following shari’ah, especially among the Batinis. In contrast, the Twelve- Imam Shi’ites consider the prophet to be the seat of prophecy and believe him to have twelve successors and executors of his will. They hold the external aspect of the shari’sh to be valid and impossible to abrogate. they affirm that the Quran has both an exoteric and an esoteric aspect.

Summary of the history of twelve- Imam Shi’ism
The majority of shi’ites is Twelvers. They were originally the same group of friend and supporters of Ali, who, after the death of the prophet, in order to defend the right of the House hold of the prophet in the question of the caliphate and religious authority, began to criticize and protest against prevalent views and separated from the majority of the people.

During the caliphate of the rightly – guided caliphs(11/632-35/656) the shi’ites were under a certain amount of pressure which became much greater during the Umayyad caliphate ( 40/661/132/750) when they were no longer protected in any way against destruction of their lives and property. Yet the greater the pressure placed upon them, the firmer they became in their belief. They especially benefited from their being oppressed in spreading their beliefs and teachings.

From the middle of the 2 nd/ 8 th centuries when the Abbasis caliphs established their dynasty, shi’ism was able to gain a mew life as a result of the languid and weak state prevailing at that time. Soon, however, conditions became difficult once again and until the end of 3 rd / 9 th century became ever more stringent.

At the beginning of the 4 th/ 10 th century, with the rise of the influential Buyids, Who were shi’ ites, shi’ism gained power and became more or less free to carry out its activities. It began to carry out scientific and scholarly debates and continued in this manner until the end of the 5 Th /11 Th centuries. At the beginning of the 7 th/ 13 th centuries when the Mongol invasion began, as a result of the general involvement in war and chaos and the continuation of the crusades, the different Islamic governments did not put too great a pressure upon the Shiites. Morever, the conversion to shi’ism of some Mongol rules in Persia and the rule of the sadat- i Mar’ ashi (who were Shiites) in Mazandaran were instrumental in the spread of the power and territory of shi’ism They made the presence lage concentrations of shi’ite population in Persia and other Muslim land felt more than ever before. this situation continued thtough the 9 th. 15 th century.

At the beginning of the 10 Th / 16 th century, as a result of the rise of the safavids shi’ism became the official religion of the vast territories of Persia and continues in this position to the present day. In other regions of the world also there are tens of millions of shi’ites.

Sources

Keywords